Gravy Train Gone: Kevin Hunter, His Side Family, and the Myth of Wendy’s Forever Money

Some men do not just marry a woman, they quietly marry her paycheck, her public image, and every future deposit she has not even earned yet. In the saga of Wendy Williams and Kevin Hunter, what looked like a traditional husband-manager situation slowly revealed itself as a long con built on the belief that her “forever money” would never stop flowing, no matter how messy he made the marriage or how public the humiliation became. When a man starts treating your career like his personal pension fund, you are not in a love story, you are in a financial horror film with a pop-psychology twist.

The story of Kevin, his side family, and the slow collapse of the Wendy Williams empire is not just celebrity gossip, it is a live-action case study in entitlement, narcissistic fantasy, and the dangerous myth that a woman’s grind will always be there to rescue a man from his own reckless choices. The receipts are not just the blogs and court documents; the real receipts are his reactions when the checks slowed down. That is when the mask truly slipped, and the “boss” image gave way to a man scrambling to keep a side lifestyle going on money that was never really his in the first place.

This is where DarkBlueNarc lives: at the intersection of messy real-life stories and the psychology of why certain men will bet their entire identity on the assumption that a humiliated woman will keep paying them like a severance package with no expiration date. Kevin Hunter did not just gamble with a marriage. He gambled with a brand, a woman’s health, and a public reputation, all while building a second household like it came as a complimentary perk with her syndicated talk show.

The Day Kevin Bet on Wendy’s Wallet

Every narcissistic money story has a moment when the man quietly stops seeing the woman as a person and starts seeing her as an institution. With Kevin Hunter, that pivot happened the moment Wendy’s career transitioned from “radio star with buzz” to “television franchise with syndication potential.” Overnight, her talent was not just something he supported; it was something he leveraged as if it were his private asset. A real partner sees their spouse’s success as shared joy. A covertly entitled partner sees it as collateral.

When a husband becomes a manager, the line between love and ledger gets dangerously thin. In that manager role, Kevin could present himself as the engine behind the brand while quietly riding the wave of every deal, every raise, and every expansion. It is a clever setup: if things go well, he takes credit as the strategic mind. If things go badly, he still expects a paycheck because “we built this together.” What he is really building, though, is a narrative where her hard work becomes the floor and ceiling of his lifestyle.

Men like this often act as if they invested sweat equity that entitles them to a lifelong payout, regardless of how they behave or how deeply they violate the relationship. The cheat code in their mind is simple: once her income crosses a certain level, they mentally log it as a permanent pipeline. This is where narcissistic entitlement merges with financial opportunism. The money stops being “our income” and morphs into “my security,” even as he chips away at the very woman whose grind is funding his sense of power.

What makes this kind of dynamic especially dangerous is how it hides under the language of “support.” He can say, “I believed in her when nobody else did,” while holding a lifestyle that she is largely underwriting. He can claim he was protecting the brand while simultaneously making choices that threaten that very brand. The subtext is that her work, her platform, and her emotional labor should keep paying him, no matter how recklessly he plays with her trust.

Side Chick, Side Baby, Main Account: How the Math Never Mapped

One of the most delusional parts of the Kevin Hunter story is how confidently he seemed to believe that Wendy’s money could stretch across multiple realities: the public wife, the private mistress, the eventual side baby, and his own self-image as a power player. The math was never just financial, it was psychological. A narcissistic mind will convince itself that the universe will keep rearranging itself to support its desires, even when the numbers on the page say otherwise.

Maintaining a wife and a secret “almost-parallel” relationship is not cheap. There are apartments, cars, trips, gifts, and the quiet costs of building a whole shadow life. When that shadow life evolves into a side baby and a full-blown second household, the main account becomes both the financier and the emotional shock absorber. Wendy’s money was expected to hold all of that: the marital home, the show’s image, and the side-life expenses that were stacked on top like an overdraft waiting to happen.

Narcissistic logic frames this as inevitable: “Of course I deserve all of this; look at how much I have done.” The woman becomes an unspoken bank, and the mistress becomes an unspoken luxury item paid for by that bank. What is striking is not just that he cheated, but that he seemed to organize his entire financial reality as if Wendy’s income would always rise to meet his choices. That is not love, that is treating your partner like a living credit line with no limit and no right to freeze the account.

The emotional math is equally twisted. In this mindset, the wife is supposed to be endlessly resilient, endlessly professional, and endlessly profitable, even while being publicly humiliated. There is a belief that no matter what he does, she will keep showing up, keep working, and keep paying. The mistress, meanwhile, is sold the fantasy that she is the future, the soft place to land, the one who will reap the rewards once the dust settles. What both women are actually dealing with is a man whose only consistent loyalty is to his lifestyle.

When “Happily Ever After” Depends on Her Direct Deposit

In fairy tales, “happily ever after” is about love conquering all. In certain modern marriages, “happily ever after” is about the direct deposit hitting on schedule. The second you are in a relationship where your partner’s sense of stability is more tied to your paycheck than to your actual presence, you are not in a romance, you are in a contract they expect you to honor even after they have broken every term. Kevin Hunter’s version of happily ever after looked less like partnership and more like a long-term payment plan.

This is the psychology of a man who thinks affection, loyalty, and basic decency are negotiable, but financial support is non-negotiable. He may adjust his emotional availability, his honesty, and his faithfulness, but he expects the money to remain constant and unquestioned. In his world, the emotional relationship can collapse, the public image can crack, but the deposits should still arrive like clockwork. The audacity sits in believing that a woman you have repeatedly disrespected still owes you financial comfort.

Many women do not recognize this red flag early because it masquerades as shared ambition. A partner may talk about “our future,” “our empire,” and “our legacy,” but never build anything that could stand alone without her work. The clearest sign is this: if your money stops tomorrow, whose entire existence falls apart first, yours or his? When a man has built his identity around being funded by your efforts, he will treat your burnout, illness, or career shift as a personal attack on his entitlements.

The deeper issue is that a man like this does not want “happily ever after” with you; he wants “happily ever after” with the lifestyle you create. If he can have that lifestyle with you, he will. If he can have that lifestyle with you while also building a side family, he will. And if the original source of the lifestyle tries to cut him off, he will absolutely spin himself as the victim of some grand injustice. To him, the real betrayal is not his cheating, it is the possibility that the money might stop.

Building a Second Household on Syndication Fantasy

The boldest part of the Kevin Hunter blueprint was not just having a mistress, it was treating that mistress and their child like a second family entitled to ride the same money wave as the legal wife. That is not random recklessness, that is a very specific type of entitlement: the belief that once a woman reaches a certain level of income, her earnings are a community resource for whatever life he feels like constructing. In his mind, syndication and steady checks meant he could build a whole separate universe with no real consequences.

Second households do not assemble themselves. There are leases to sign, cars to fund, bills to cover, and images to maintain. This is where the fantasy of “forever money” does the most damage. Instead of making conservative, independent financial moves, he doubled down on the idea that as long as Wendy’s brand remained strong, he could continue expanding his private orbit. The side home becomes an extension of the main home, in his thinking, because he ties all of it to her perceived earning power.

From a pop psychology lens, this is classic grandiose thinking. He is not just cheating; he is curating two realities like a man who believes he is the sun and both women are just planets rotating around his glow. This is why he can rationalize funneling resources out of the main life into the side life. If he sees himself as the mastermind, then her money is just the tool that helps him “take care of everyone.” The language sounds generous, but the behavior is parasitic.

What often goes unsaid is how exhausting and destabilizing this is for the woman whose name is on the actual checks. Even if she does not know all the details, her body and mind feel the weight. The constant pressure to perform, the unexplained financial drains, the emotional confusion—it all lands on her nervous system. Meanwhile, he tells himself that he is providing, protecting, and “handling business,” when what he is really doing is quietly leveraging her grind as the fuel for his double life.

End of Part One. Part Two continues the gravy train crash: the moment the checks slowed, the panic started, and the “boss” image collapsed into pure beneficiary energy.

By the time a narcissistically entitled partner has settled into a double life, he is no longer just spending money, he is spending your future. That is what makes the Kevin Hunter story so instructive. The same man who once moved like a behind-the-scenes “boss” ended up behaving like a long-term beneficiary who assumed the gravy train could never, ever derail. When life finally tested that assumption, the public saw what many women discover in private: once the deposits slow, the mask of dominance slips and the panic underneath starts screaming.

Part Two of this saga walks into the exact moment when the fantasy math hit real-world limits. The television era shifted, health and legal issues collided, and the checks that were supposed to roll in forever suddenly came with question marks. For a man who built a side household, a lifestyle brand in his own head, and a retirement fantasy on his ex-wife’s grind, the slowdown was not just financial. It was an identity crisis he could not emotionally afford.

The Moment the Checks Slowed and the Panic Started

Narcissistic entitlement often looks calm when the money is flowing and the bills are being paid without resistance. The true personality emerges when the cash stream turns into a trickle. In Kevin’s case, the slowing and interruption of payments transformed the “I built this with you” narrative into a loud “you owe me” performance. That shift is the tell. A person who genuinely respects the partnership grieves the loss and adapts; a person who feels owed goes straight to rage, blame, and courtroom declarations about how unfair life has been to him.

When the spousal support and severance arrangements were disrupted, he did not respond like a former partner looking for solutions. He reacted like a displaced beneficiary watching his unearned security slip away. The man who once moved in designer clothes and expensive cars was suddenly invoking words like “broke,” “foreclosure,” and “I have fallen behind,” but always as a victim, never as the architect of his own unstable design. This is classic panic: not just fear of losing comfort, but terror of being exposed as someone who never built a solid foundation outside her name.

The psychology behind that panic is simple but dark. For years, his self-image was inflated by proximity to her success. He was “the husband,” “the manager,” “the protector of the brand.” When the payments slowed, all those labels collapsed into one uncomfortable reality: a man who had tied his identity to checks he did not control. Instead of asking, “How did I get here, and how do I fix it?” the narcissistic mind asks, “Who can I pressure, sue, or guilt-trip to turn the faucet back on?”

This is a powerful lesson for women. If a man becomes verbally frantic, legally aggressive, or emotionally manipulative the second your money is interrupted—while showing no parallel urgency about earning his own—believe what his reaction is telling you. He did not see your income as a blessing. He saw it as his baseline. Any change feels like robbery because, in his mind, the money was already pre-assigned to him as a permanent right.

From Boss to Beneficiary: Kevin Hunter’s Identity Freefall

In the early days, Kevin presented like the archetypal behind-the-scenes boss: handling business, negotiating deals, framing himself as the strategic backbone of the Wendy Williams machine. That image worked as long as the empire was thriving and the money was consistent. But when the pipeline faltered, the “boss” façade dropped, revealing what he had actually become: a man more dependent on a woman’s past success than invested in his own future capabilities.

Identity freefall happens to narcissistic personalities when their external supply is cut. If they have built their entire sense of worth around a role—husband of a star, manager of a franchise, man of the house in a certain tax bracket—any disruption forces them to face the question they avoided for years: “Who am I without this association?” Instead of doing that inner work, a man like Kevin tends to double down on old titles, insisting the world still owes him the same treatment, even though the circumstances have changed.

Notice how this dynamic flips the script. Once upon a time, he could talk about providing and protecting. In the aftermath, his public stance looks less like leadership and more like a long list of grievances about what he is allegedly entitled to collect. That is the journey from boss to beneficiary. He stops selling the story of “I built this,” and starts leaning heavily on “I deserve this,” as if the entire relationship and brand should function like his personal retirement account.

Pop psychology calls this a collapse of the grandiose self. The internal story that says “I am powerful and essential” clashes with a reality that says “the money, the spotlight, and the influence were never actually yours.” Some men respond to that clash by doing the humble thing: downsizing, seeking work, taking accountability. Others respond the way Kevin did: by fighting to legally reattach themselves to the very woman they destabilized, as if her existence is the only thing standing between them and total ruin.

Mistress Lifestyle on Ex-Wife Money: The Entitlement Equation

It is one thing for an ex-husband to seek support while he gets on his feet. It is another thing entirely when the lifestyle he is desperate to preserve includes a mistress-turned-partner, a side baby, and the trappings of a second household all curated during the marriage. That is not a safety net request; that is an entitlement equation. In Kevin’s reality, the woman he betrayed is supposed to bankroll not just his life, but the life he constructed with someone else while still cashing checks off the first wife’s name.

This is where the narcissistic math gets especially offensive. He behaves as if he is the one abandoned by the system, despite having benefited for years from her success and visibility. The ex-wife is automatically cast as a cold figure withholding “what he is due,” rather than a human being who already paid a heavy emotional, physical, and financial cost. Meanwhile, the side partner has been sold the idea that her comfort, her home, and her child’s stability should be underwritten by a woman she helped humiliate.

In that mindset, the ex-wife is always wrong no matter what she does. If she pays, she is “doing the bare minimum” or “making up for what he invested.” If she stops paying, she is painted as vindictive, selfish, or heartless. The mistress is framed as an innocent bystander whose lifestyle deserves continuity, as if she did not knowingly participate in a long-term deception funded by someone else’s grind. The man at the center gets to float above it, claiming he is just trying to “take care of his family.”

The entitlement equation is simple: his comfort comes first, his image comes second, and the emotional wreckage of the woman whose work created the money comes last, if it is acknowledged at all. When he says he is struggling, what he really means is that he is struggling to maintain the inflated life he curated off a salary that no longer belongs to him. That is not struggle in the moral sense; that is a correction. The universe is simply returning expenses to their rightful owner.

Court Papers, Foreclosure Notices, and “I’m Broke” Confessions

Nothing reveals the truth behind a “forever money” fantasy like official paperwork. Court filings, foreclosure notices, and public declarations of being financially underwater are the unglamorous footnotes to a lifestyle that was never sustainable without constant deposits from the original source. In Kevin’s story, the documents tell on him. They expose a man who lived like the checks would never slow, then cried financial crisis when the arrangement changed instead of adapting like an adult.

The “I’m broke” confession hits differently when it comes from someone who had years of access to substantial income and opportunities to build independent streams. When a woman says she is broke after a man drains her, there is often empathy. When a man who leveraged her career and built a second life on her earnings says it, the energy shifts. It reads less like tragedy and more like the overdue bill on a long-running pattern of choices he never thought he would have to pay for.

It is also important to look at how the story gets framed publicly. The legal system, the media, and social media all end up as stages where he can audition for sympathy. He leans on words like “unfair,” “changed circumstances,” and “I cannot keep up,” but downplays the way he stacked his expenses on top of a single woman’s labor. The foreclosure notices are not just about losing property. They are a spotlight on the reality that he was never the financial engine he branded himself to be.

For women watching, this is a crucial wake-up call. Paperwork never lies. A man can talk endlessly about what he brings to the table, but when the relationship ends and the receipts are laid out, the question is simple: who was actually funding the life you lived? If his primary financial storyline post-divorce is chasing your money through courts, claims, and public complaints, then the truth is this: he was never your co-pilot. He was your most expensive passenger.

Why Some Men Think Humiliated Women Still Owe Them a Pension

One of the darkest parts of the Kevin Hunter saga is not just the financial mess, but the psychology underneath it: the genuine belief that a woman he humiliated in public still owes him a lifetime pension. This mindset is not unique to him. There is a certain breed of man who sees a woman’s success as something he is automatically grandfathered into, even after cheating, lying, and detonating her peace. In his mind, the betrayal does not cancel the benefits. The betrayal is just a messy chapter in the story of why she should pay him more.

These men blend patriarchy and parasitism into one warped worldview. On one hand, they want traditional respect: the deference, the titles, the aura of being “the man of the house.” On the other hand, they want modern benefits: a high-earning woman, a public platform, a lifestyle funded by her work. When they shatter the relationship, they do not see it as losing access to her. They see it as renegotiating the terms of their compensation package. Her tears are irrelevant. Her humiliation is just background noise.

Pop psychology would call this a fusion of entitlement, lack of empathy, and self-serving rationalization. He genuinely believes his contributions—emotional support, networking, time spent around her business—translate into a permanent financial obligation that survives infidelity, disrespect, and the creation of a side family. If you ask him whether she should ever be allowed to walk away and keep her own money, he will either dodge the question or argue that “it is only fair” he keeps getting paid.

The most chilling part is how normalized this can become if women are not careful. When a man repeatedly says things like “you would be nothing without me” or “all of this is because of us,” he is not just bragging. He is rehearsing a future argument for why he should always be on your payroll. The Kevin Hunter situation is extreme, but the underlying belief is common: once a woman reaches a certain level, some men feel entitled to treat her labor as their forever pension, no matter how dirty they play the game.

End of Part Two. Part Three will dig into narcissistic retirement plans, red flags to spot a Kevin before he spends you, and the DarkBlueNarc takeaway you can use in real life.

By the time a man is in court arguing over support while also juggling the wreckage of a side household, his real plan has already been exposed. It was never just about love, family, or partnership. It was about securing a comfortable landing pad with a woman’s money as the built-in cushion. The Kevin Hunter saga shows exactly how far some men will go to turn a relationship into a long-term payout, even after they have drained the emotional, physical, and reputational accounts of the woman who funded their rise.

Part Three is where DarkBlueNarc flips the script from just analyzing one messy celebrity case to decoding the pattern. Behind every “I deserve her money forever” performance is a man who quietly built a narcissistic retirement plan around a woman’s grind. That is the lesson. It is not only about Wendy Williams and Kevin Hunter; it is about every woman who has ever been told she owes a pension to the same man who made her life harder while her career was paying all the bills.

Narcissistic Retirement Plans: When Your Exit Strategy Is Her Grind

A narcissistic retirement plan is not about savings accounts, investments, or long-term strategy. It is about identifying a woman with earning power and slowly structuring your life so that her income becomes your safety net. Instead of building something of his own, a man like Kevin makes her work his exit strategy. Her talk show, her brand, her public appeal, and her syndication deals mutate into his future comfort. The plans he should have created with a financial adviser, he tries to outsource to his ex-wife’s ongoing labor.

The blueprint usually follows the same pattern. First, he embeds himself in her career as a manager, advisor, or “essential” partner, so he can later claim that any success she has is technically “theirs.” Then, he lives expansively on the joint lifestyle, often spending as if the money is guaranteed forever. Finally, when the relationship implodes, he does not pivot to self-reliance. He escalates his demands, arguing that his past proximity to her work justifies indefinite payouts. In his mind, he did not marry a person; he married a cash-flow projection.

This mindset is especially dangerous when the woman’s health or mental well-being becomes fragile. In Wendy’s case, the combination of public pressure, health struggles, and legal complications around her finances created a vulnerable situation. A man operating in good faith would have stepped back, respected boundaries, and figured out how to stabilize his own life without leaning harder on her name. A man operating from narcissistic entitlement sees her vulnerability as a timing issue, not a moral one. He still wants his check; he just has to decide which angle to use to get it.

That is the quiet cruelty of the narcissistic retirement plan. It does not care about the state of the woman who built the empire. It does not care if she is exhausted, ill, or just done. It only cares that she once made a certain amount of money and that, in his mind, he already spent that money in advance. Any attempt on her part to reclaim her finances will be met with accusations, guilt trips, and legal maneuvers, all aimed at pushing her back into the role of financial provider for a man she has already emotionally fired.

Lessons for Women: Spotting a Kevin Before He Spends You

The most important part of this story is not the gossip, it is the prevention. Before a man becomes a full-blown “Kevin Hunter” in your life, there are early warning signs that his relationship with your money is not healthy. One of the first red flags is how he reacts to your ambition. Does he genuinely encourage your dreams while building his own, or does he quickly pivot to attaching himself to your projects, your platforms, and your professional network while doing the bare minimum for his own trajectory?

Pay close attention to language. A financially respectful partner says things like “I want us both to be secure” and backs it up with separate and joint efforts. An entitled partner constantly centers himself, saying, “We would not be here without me,” “I made you,” or “All of this belongs to us,” even when the majority of the labor, risk, and public exposure fell on you. He is not just hyping the relationship; he is rehearsing the closing arguments for future support claims if things go left.

Another sign is how he behaves when you set financial boundaries. If you say, “I am not comfortable funding this,” does he respond with understanding and alternative ideas, or does he pout, pressure, and punish? A man who respects you will adjust his expectations when you clarify limits. A man who sees you as an ATM with feelings will argue, sulk, or manipulate until you give in. That reaction is the dress rehearsal for how he will treat you if you ever try to cut him off permanently.

Watch how he talks about work and sacrifice. If he constantly frames your career as something that “owes” him, if he recounts every supportive thing he has ever done as if it were an invoice, if he positions himself as the silent architect of your success, you are dealing with a man who is tallying, not loving. Talliers become litigators. When the relationship ends, they pull out their mental spreadsheet and convert every remembered favor into an argument for why you should pay them like a corporation settling a lawsuit.

Also notice how he handles his own earning potential. Does he pursue real opportunities, build skills, or create income streams that are not dependent on your name? Or does he drift, dabble, and blame circumstantial obstacles while always finding a way to live at or above your level? If you are the consistent worker and he is the consistent consumer, he is already acting like your future severance recipient. You just have not seen the paperwork yet.

One practical rule: never let a man who disrespects you manage your money, your brand, or your paperwork. Once he shows you that he can lie, cheat, or humiliate you, assume he will also feel entitled to remix your financial reality to his liking. If he wants control over your income but refuses accountability for his behavior, you do not have a partner. You have a risk factor attached to your bank account.

DarkBlueNarc Takeaway: Never Be the Career He Tries to Cash Out On

The DarkBlueNarc thesis for this whole Wendy and Kevin saga is simple: never be the career a man tries to cash out on. Be the woman with her own life, her own boundaries, and her own exit plan that does not involve sending lifetime payments to someone who made your worst days even harder. If a man wants a retirement plan, he can talk to a financial planner, not to his ex-wife’s lawyer about how to keep drinking from a well he helped poison.

Celebrity stories make the dynamics loud, but the pattern shows up quietly in everyday relationships. It is the boyfriend who “temporarily” moves in and never contributes. It is the husband who quits his job the moment your income rises, then resents you when you are tired. It is the ex who resurfaces only to ask for money, cosigns, or favors, using history and guilt as leverage. Different tax brackets, same energy: the belief that your work should keep cushioning his life, no matter what he did or failed to do.

The real flex is not just leaving a man like that; it is refusing to design your life so that he could ever hold that kind of financial power in the first place. That means separate accounts, clear legal protections, written agreements, and a refusal to let someone manage your business who cannot even manage his own integrity. Love can be soft. Contracts cannot. A narcissist may beg for grace, but your money needs guardrails, not vibes.

DarkBlueNarc’s message to women is not “never trust,” but “never fund your own downfall.” Help a man grow, sure, but do not confuse support with sponsorship. Once his behavior starts to look like Kevin Hunter’s—financial dependence, side-life entitlement, and public victim-playing when the cash slows—it is time to step back and remember: your talent is not a pension plan for a man who gambled your peace for his ego. You are the asset. He is the expense.

Connect with Darkbluenarc

If this breakdown of narcissistic entitlement and “forever money” fantasies hit a little too close to home, stay tapped in with DarkBlueNarc for more pop-psychology dissections, financial boundary talk, and unapologetic commentary on messy relationship dynamics.

• Pinterest: @Darkbluenarc
• Facebook: Dark Blue Narc
• Instagram: @darkbluenarc
• X (Twitter): @darkbluenarc

Disclaimer

This content is for informational and entertainment purposes only and reflects commentary and opinion based on publicly available information about the individuals and events discussed. It is not intended to provide mental health, legal, financial, or medical advice, and it should not be used as a substitute for professional guidance from licensed practitioners.

All individuals mentioned remain innocent of any criminal wrongdoing unless proven otherwise in a court of law, and no statements here are meant to defame, harass, or misrepresent any party. Readers who are experiencing psychological distress, financial abuse, domestic abuse, or other serious issues are strongly encouraged to seek help from qualified mental health professionals, legal counsel, and relevant support services in their local area.

References

BET Staff, “Wendy Williams Ex-Husband Claims He Is Broke And Facing Foreclosure,” BET. https://www.bet.com/article/ewzsmq/wendy-williams-ex-husband-claims-he-is-broke-and-facing-foreclosure

People Staff, “Wendy Williams' Ex Kevin Hunter Demands 23 Months of Missed Payments,” People. https://people.com/wendy-williams-guardian-demands-ex-kevin-hunter-return-112k-divorce-claims-he-hasnt-been-paid-23-months-86083

Black Enterprise Staff, “Kevin Hunter Sells $1.25 Million Mansion After Losing Legal Battle Over Alimony,” Black Enterprise. https://www.blackenterprise.com/kevin-hunter-sells-off-million-mansion-alimony/

Black Enterprise Staff, “Wendy Williams’ Ex Asked to Return ‘Overpaid’ Settlement,” Black Enterprise. https://www.blackenterprise.com/wendy-williams-guardian-kevin-hunter-divorce-settlement/

The Root Staff, “Wendy Williams’ Ex Kevin Hunter Might Go Broke Again. Here’s Why,” The Root. https://www.theroot.com/why-wendy-williams-ex-kevin-hunter-might-have-to-pay-ba-1851443049

Yahoo Entertainment Staff, “Wendy Williams' Legal Guardian Demands $112,000 From Ex Kevin Hunter,” Yahoo Entertainment. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/wendy-williams-legal-guardian-demands-101136774.html

WBLS News Staff, “Wendy Williams’ Ex-Husband Forced To Put House Up For Sale,” WBLS. https://stg.wbls.com/wbls-news/wendy-williams-ex-husband-forced-to-put-house-up-for-sale

Us Weekly Staff, “Timeline of Wendy Williams' Marriage with Kevin Hunter That Led to Their Split,” Us Weekly. https://news.amomama.com/144955-timeline-wendy-williams-marriage-kevin-h.html

Nicki Swift Staff, “How Much Did Wendy Williams Lose In Her Divorce From Kevin Hunter?,” Nicki Swift. https://www.nickiswift.com/1415069/how-much-wendy-williams-lost-divorce-kevin-hunter/

EntertainmentNow Staff, “Wendy Williams’ Ex Kevin Hunter Confirms He & Mistress Are Still Together,” EntertainmentNow. https://entertainmentnow.com/news/kevin-hunter-sharina-hudson-together/

Us Weekly Staff, “Wendy Williams' Estranged Husband Gets Groceries for Alleged Mistress,” Us Weekly. https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/pictures/wendy-williams-estranged-husband-gets-groceries-for-alleged-mistress/

BET Video Team, “Wendy Williams Ex-Husband, Kevin Hunter, Says He Is Broke And Facing Foreclosure,” BET. https://www.bet.com/video-clips/q5jurm/wendy-williams-ex-husband-kevin-hunter-says-he-is-broke-and-facing-foreclosure-i-have-fallen-behind

YouTube Creators & Commentators, various analysis videos discussing Kevin Hunter’s alimony battle, financial struggles, and relationship with Sharina Hudson (searchable by his name and “alimony,” “foreclosure,” or “Sharina Hudson” on YouTube).